What Businesses Should Know When Working With Different Types of Commercial Real Estate
By Eric C. Powell
Commercial real estate decisions are often treated as discrete transactions, but commercial real estate planning becomes critical when a business is preparing to expand, relocate, or diversify its operations. In reality, commercial real estate issues most often surface—and matter most—when a business is preparing to expand, relocate, or diversify its operations. At those moments, real estate decisions can affect timing, financial viability, operational flexibility, and long-term risk.
This topic arises most commonly during expansion, but it is not limited to growth alone. Landlords managing mixed-use developments, businesses consolidating locations, or companies reevaluating how space supports operations all encounter similar issues. What tends to create friction is not the complexity itself, but the assumption that experience with one property type or one state automatically translates to another.
Businesses often work with a business attorney or commercial real estate attorney during expansion planning to help align real estate decisions with operational and financial goals. This isn’t about spotting hidden traps. It’s about understanding patterns, accounting for differences, and engaging in thoughtful risk mitigation and planning. Commercial real estate is layered, not chaotic—and those layers become more visible as scale increases.
Retail Commercial Real Estate: Customer Access and Operational Nuance
Retail space is often the most visible form of commercial real estate planning, but it also carries some of the most nuanced operational considerations. While certain lease concepts appear across property types, retail environments frequently apply them in ways that directly affect customer experience and revenue.
Key retail considerations include customer access and visibility—door placement, signage rights, and dedicated or shared parking can materially impact performance, particularly in smaller shopping centers or urban locations. Operating hour requirements are another retail-specific issue. Ice cream shops, flower stores, and other seasonal or specialty retailers may require extended or irregular hours, which need to be reflected in lease terms.
Renewal provisions, while common across all property types, often carry greater weight in retail due to location value. A strong location can become integral to a brand, making renewal rights and rent escalation terms especially important. Relocation rights also tend to appear more frequently in retail leases, where landlords may seek flexibility to combine space for larger tenants or reposition a center, and tenants may negotiate rights of first refusal on more desirable locations.
As retail footprints grow, additional issues arise: dock doors for inventory loading, restrictions on container storage in parking areas, and limitations tied to shared common spaces.
Guarantee structures also differ by market reality. In small and mid-size retail, personal guaranties remain common, while letters of credit are typically reserved for very large or institutional tenants. Understanding how guarantees are used—and why—helps both landlords and tenants evaluate risk more realistically.
Office Space: Class, Access, and Cost Allocation
Office space tends to involve longer planning horizons and different risk allocations. One factor that often shapes negotiations is building class. Class A, B, and C office space can differ significantly in buildout expectations, amenity availability, operating costs, and renewal leverage.
Building access and security have become increasingly important, particularly in properties where amenities are open to the public. Some businesses require restricted access to floors or suites, even within amenity-rich buildings, and lease terms need to account for those operational needs.
Parking is another issue that can materially affect office operations, especially in downtown or high-density areas where availability and cost may be limited. Parking rights, allocation, and pricing are often as important as square footage.
Amenities frequently serve as a selling point for office space, but they also introduce complexity. Costs may be explicit or embedded in per-square-foot pricing, and lease negotiations may need to address access rights, usage limits, and what happens if amenities are later reduced or eliminated. What initially appears attractive can become a point of friction if usage patterns or business needs change.
Industrial and Warehouse Space: Infrastructure and Long-Term Commitment
Industrial and warehouse space shifts the focus away from customer experience and toward infrastructure, logistics, and long-term operational commitments. These properties often involve longer lease terms, greater capital investment, and more specialized use.
Key considerations include zoning and permitted use, access for trucks or rail, and participation in free trade zones. Flexibility can be critical: businesses may need the ability to expand into adjacent bays, contract operations, or adapt space as distribution needs change.
Dock infrastructure is a major issue—availability, type, and maintenance responsibilities for dock doors can significantly affect costs. Racking systems, whether pre-existing or tenant-installed, also require careful allocation of responsibility.
Equipment installation is often central to industrial use. Floor penetrations to secure heavy equipment, roof or wall penetrations for utilities, and increased electrical or mechanical capacity can all trigger structural and liability concerns that need to be addressed upfront.
Environmental considerations require careful balancing. Tenants need to avoid responsibility for pre-existing conditions and may require environmental studies even in lease transactions. Landlords, in turn, must ensure that liabilities created during tenancy revert appropriately at move-out to avoid remediation costs.
Leasing vs. Purchasing: Strategic and Structural Choices
The decision to lease or purchase commercial real estate cuts across all property types and often reflects broader business strategy rather than purely legal considerations. Business and financial factors typically drive the initial decision, while legal considerations shape structure and risk allocation.
Purchasing real estate is generally more complex than leasing. A lease transaction may involve a lease agreement and limited due diligence, depending on the property. A purchase, by contrast, includes a purchase agreement, surveys, title work, environmental studies, financing documents, and closing mechanics.
Corporate structuring plays an important role. Real estate is often held in a separate entity to compartmentalize liability, but ownership alignment varies. Some business owners want exposure to real estate appreciation, while others prefer to focus exclusively on operations.
Certain strategies, such as sale-leaseback or build-to-suit transactions, can align real estate decisions with branding and long-term growth. Franchise systems and multi-location businesses must also consider how real estate choices affect consistency, scalability, and brand presence.
Control versus adaptability becomes especially important with specialized space. In some cases—such as refrigerated warehouses or custom manufacturing facilities—ownership may be the only way to ensure long-term availability.
When Property Type and Geography Intersect
Complexity increases when businesses operate across multiple property types and multiple states. The key is identifying issues early, rather than reacting after commitments are made. Working with an experienced real estate attorney familiar with Ohio and Georgia can help businesses structure these decisions in a way that supports long-term growth rather than short-term convenience.
Financial considerations often drive the big picture—whether to lease or buy, where to locate, and how quickly to expand. Legal considerations then shape the structure, risk allocation, and enforceability of those decisions.
The same property type can raise different issues depending on geography. A company expanding into a new state may initially lease space, even if it owns property in its home state, until operations prove viable. Over time, ownership may follow.
Even virtual or service-based businesses encounter these issues. Powell Legal itself maintains office space in more than one state, illustrating that multi-state real estate considerations are not limited to large enterprises.
Managing this layered complexity requires coordination among a knowledgeable real estate team—legal counsel, CPAs, brokers, lenders, and other advisors. No single professional knows everything, and effective planning depends on collaboration rather than silos.
Conclusion: Planning for Growth Without Overcomplicating It
Commercial real estate planning decisions are layered, not chaotic. Problems tend to arise when decisions are made in isolation or without early input from the real estate team.
Most businesses don’t need to master every nuance of every property type or state. What they need is a coordinated approach that keeps real estate decisions aligned with growth plans, risk tolerance, and operational reality.
Thoughtful planning allows businesses and property owners alike to expand, reposition, and adapt—without unnecessary friction or surprise.
© 2026 The Powell Legal Firm, LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed without prior written permission from The Powell Legal Firm, LLC.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney–client relationship. Readers should consult with qualified legal counsel regarding their individual circumstances before making decisions based on this information.
